U4TY
Thành viên tích cực
Authors: Michael Power - ESRC Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science
Source: Review of International Political Economy
Abstract: Until the ‘Basel 2’ reforms to banking supervision, operational risk was largely a residual category for risks and uncertainties which were difficult to quantify, insure and manage in traditional ways. This paper examines the rapid emergence of operational risk from this low epistemic status to its insti- tutionalization as a key component of global banking regulation. However, the meaning and implications of the Basel proposals have been fiercely con- tested by international banks and three key domains of policy controversy have been, and remain, particularly visible: definitional issues, data collection and the limits of quantification. Tensions in these three areas are discussed and reveal the significance of operational risk as a meeting point for di- verse concerns and interests, and as a potential reinvention of a management knowledge hybrid between auditing and finance. The paper draws attention to the ironies and ontradictions of this operational risk programme, which is part of a visionary project to extend ‘enforced self-regulation’ deep into the operations of banking, combining advanced technical modelling ideas on the one hand and softer corporate governance thinking on the other.
Source: Review of International Political Economy
Abstract: Until the ‘Basel 2’ reforms to banking supervision, operational risk was largely a residual category for risks and uncertainties which were difficult to quantify, insure and manage in traditional ways. This paper examines the rapid emergence of operational risk from this low epistemic status to its insti- tutionalization as a key component of global banking regulation. However, the meaning and implications of the Basel proposals have been fiercely con- tested by international banks and three key domains of policy controversy have been, and remain, particularly visible: definitional issues, data collection and the limits of quantification. Tensions in these three areas are discussed and reveal the significance of operational risk as a meeting point for di- verse concerns and interests, and as a potential reinvention of a management knowledge hybrid between auditing and finance. The paper draws attention to the ironies and ontradictions of this operational risk programme, which is part of a visionary project to extend ‘enforced self-regulation’ deep into the operations of banking, combining advanced technical modelling ideas on the one hand and softer corporate governance thinking on the other.
